Top 10 Alice in Wonderland Movies – Ranked Bad to Worst

#1
One of the better versions of Alice in Wonderland on film is the very first one made, in Britain in 1903, by Cecil Hepworth and Percy Stow, starring May Clark as Alice.
I like how the different scenes closely match John Tenniel’s original illustrations. Only one copy exists, held by the British Film Institute. Watch the restored version here, it’s about 10 minutes long, is still far better and more respectful to Carroll’s creation than Tim Burton’s Alice.

#2
You could argue that Disney created the definitive look of Alice in Wonderland. A young Walt Disney, working at Laugh-O-Gram studios, created the short Alice’s Wonderland. Though he planned a full feature, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was made instead. At one point, Aldous Huxley was even commissioned to rewrite the story, but that version was reportedly lost in a fire. In the end, the 1951 film received mediocre to negative reviews. As the New York Times said,

“Mr. Disney has plunged into those works… whipped them up as colorful cartoons, thrown them together willy‑nilly with small regard for sequence of episodes…”

I agree, though Disney mixed Wonderland with Looking‑Glass, earlier stage productions (with Carroll’s blessing) did the same. Still, its charm and iconic imagery, including Alice, the Cheshire Cat, Tweedledee and Tweedledum, and the Caterpillar, make it, although flawed, an attractive adaptation.

#3
Talk about highly artistic, while challenging (on a sheer entertainment level) Alice in Wonderland films…I give you, Jan Svankmajer’s, Alice (1988), originally titled in Czech, Něco z Alenky.

Delivered in stop-motion avant-garde we’re-not-here-to-have-fun way. Svankmajer’s Alice, wasn’t his first attempt at killing Wonderland-related fun, he did so with an earlier work, titled “Jabberwocky“, which is only a couple of minutes long, mainly of bizarre dolls prancing around (that’s Svankmajer’s work in a nutshell).

What do I hold in its favor? The fact that it has absolute artistic integrity. Unwatchable and exhausting as it is, it’s still far better than Burton’s Alice.

#4
The most watchable ‘Alice in Wonderland’ adaptation, in my opinion, is channel 4’s 1998, “Through the Looking glass”, starring Kate Beckinsale as Alice. I’m not positioning it at #1 since they haven’t made ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and jumped right ahead to the sequel. which is an interesting choice. As this one makes a real effort at sticking to the text and is rather entertaining, it deserves to be high up. Since most Alice in Wonderland adaptations were a the mishmash of both books, I think it’s alright to allow this confusion to exist in this post.
Watch this clip of Desmond Barrit, as Humpty Dumpty, giving an Academy Award winning reading of “The Jabberwocky“. The entire movie is available right here

#5
Coming up at number 5, is the 1933 film production, starring Charlotte Henry as Alice, with Gary Cooper as the White Knight, and the unrecognizable Cary Grant, as the Mock turtle.

The Internet Archive has a pretty good copy, available to watch online, or download, check it out here.
I admit that part of what I like about this production, has to do with the few ‘Alice in Wonderland’ book editions, that followed its release, with images from the film. I’ll write about those at a later post.

This adaptation, mashes up the stories of ‘Wonderland’ and ‘Looking Glass’, as many other do. The movie begins with a bored Alice with her nanny, although she looks like she’s in her early 20s. She’s crossing over to Wonderland, through a looking glass. Visually, the design of the characters and the scenes, resemble Tenniel’s illustrations, which add a lot to its charm. Some of the special effects in this movie, work surprisingly well, the talking clock, the tiny chess figures. Other, like Alice changing sizes, or the theatrical costumes, don’t work too well, at least from a 2022 perspective, and yet, they are all better than Tim Burton’s soulless CGI tricks.

#6
The 1931 ‘Alice in Wonderland’, directed by Bud Pollard, starring Ruth Gilbert as Alice, did not receive much commercial or critical success, but has an historical importance as the first Alice talkie (moving images with synchronized sound).
Watching it today is a challenging task, although it does have some charm in how bad it is. Ruth Gilbert looks rather modern, like a cheerful, lost millennial. Most of the movie is her walking around the cheap, theatrical production. You can watch the entire film here.

#10
Wait, what happened to 7-9?! Well, this post was ultimately a vehicle for me, to voice out how much I dislike Tim Burton’s adaptation of ‘Alice in Wonderland’. So I’m skipping ahead right to it, and maybe ill go back and add a couple of additional, blearily watchable Alice’s. Why do I hate this particular adaptation this much? it’s mainly due to having a great deal of expectations from Burton. His earlier work suggested he was the perfect director for it.
What’s wrong with his Alice? let’s get started. First of all the story, it’s not Carroll’s Alice, rather it’s a sad mishmash of Wonderland’s characters superficially presented in a weak storyline, poorly constructed, without depth, which ultimately makes for a boring movie.

It’s not even Wonderland, he called it ‘Underland’ (what the hell is Underland, Burton?).
The actors, under Burton’s direction, give a flat, caricature-like performance. Mia Wasikowska plays Alice, with zero charisma. Johnny Depp gives an over the top mad hatter, that fails to generate sympathy. Helena Bonham Carter is the always screaming Red Queen. All blended in a cgi-infused charmless Wonderland.

Burton’s adaptation doesn’t harness anything that makes the Alice books wonderful, to the point of literary abuse, while not managing to produce a decent substitute, even as a non-Alice related entertainment piece of work.
Could have this monstrosity be foreseen? Yes, Burton made his unnecessary version of ‘Planet of the apes’, he ruined ‘Dumbo’ for everyone. I don’t think anyone likes his ‘Charlie and the chocolate factory’.

The film did very well at the box office, making over $1 billion. To conclude this on a positive note, I will add, that Burton’s Alice in Wonderland, as bad as it is, is somehow better than the sequel, released a couple of years after this one, which finally closed the bin on this Burton-disney shitstorm. Burton, you should give us our money back, spend your remaining days in a remote monastery, repent, live on stale water and grains, and meditate on what you’ve done!